What song are you listening to right now? What does it mean to you?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:37
Context (since there’s every single context you or anyone could choose to clap on top of it or pretend-slide beneath any artwork) is keyhole.
The world's address
HAH. HA! No! How could I possibly be, about something as trite as art has in our day and age become? Grossaroo!
Calvin Pickard Saved The Day - Defector
Anyone who wants to pretend their free gift to the world means something other than what they actually made and gave is welcome to be that pretentious.
You say. You’re the one to be moved, after all. In the “final anal”—what some call the “final” analysis. Why be rude? Art may be! Art may be the rudest thing in the world, taken out of its own natural time, place and culture! Pay heed! Open your eyes and let your tongue waggle like a slug!
I'll repeat it for those who may not have already guessed:
LEGO Fortnite's Switch 2 Release Will Be Followed By A New Game Mode Next Week - Nintendo Life
I men: you’d have to be a surefire every-miss dweeb of cretinous nature to credit what I have to say here with authority, or even a slick, greasy Greek booty-toot of value. GROSS. GROW UP, if so! Get a real load on!
WERE WRONG, the world's address! A place that's
Is that what you think of IT? Of art? Or if you’re a real capital-A ASS, of “Art”?
Do you think Trump is a bad a$$? Why or why not?
How are you moved? It’s not a f***ing contest. Why would anyone want to WIN a f***ing contest? Oh, that triple asterisk stands for “art” not “uck.” Pretty yucky, that droll substitution. Pretty disgusting, those who try to pass it off as “fresh.”
The sales and marketing job (includes all backstory and behind-the-bio of the real maker, doer, makers or doers) is nothing to do with the genuine article: the act performed, the thing made.
It means an “accomplished fact.” Something that has already been done, and there it is: “that’s-that.”
14,000-year-old mummified ‘puppies’ weren’t dogs at all, new research shows - CNN
Yes! You nailed it! A “full-on slob-mode aficionado of pop cultural forms” to boot! Who minds what I, some rando asshat off the internet, told YOU couched so hot, deep and hard in threadbare shorts, rocking and a-rolling on a huge leather sofa stolen from “schools” and “styles” of old thought, “BUD”? Not it!
A place that's worn
I can see your secrets
Q. What song are you listening to right now? What does it mean to you?
Look.
There is no “code” in art to break.
‘Borderlands 4’ Is Now My Most-Anticipated Game Of The Year - Forbes
Big “A” or little? Done for Art’s sake, or just for free sushi and sake? Got anything for us, anything for each or all? GIVE IT UP, HOMO SAPIEN.
I like to enjoy music, literally. Just the text, just what it says.
Art is what moves you in ways mere craft could not.
Why We Still Can't Find A Solar System Twin - IFLScience
You gonna tell us the mere author or creator of a work gets to decide for YOU what it means?
Care to have a listen?
It, whatever the heck it is or may be to someone, doesn’t really mean anything else but its own real features and properties. The thing itself is what must mean, and the only thing that can mean: to anyone, everyone, okay uh-huh alright forever and ever amen.
Superbugs thrive as access to antibiotics fails in India - BBC
I say leave that to the one being called, Holmes. Or…sure, lock your tongue away behind your lips and bite yourself, hard! Why offend needlessly over what amounts to a nickname? Must you?
Whose song is it, any old way?
CALL THE MEN OF SCIENCE
Nintendo Switch 2 Launch Week Restocks - Here's What We Know So Far - GameSpot
Just leaves me depressed
Did it stink for you, or were you moved to applaud? Don’t be shy.
Under every garment I can see the world's address
Archaeologists Uncover Europe’s Oldest Megalithic Complex in France - Indian Defence Review
Feel!
Yet…
Well, duh. More than that: TUH-DUH. TA-DA! It means the words! It means each and only what the words say. Read ’em and weep not! See? Right up there for you. SEE? See!
Could Humans Transform Into Another Species? Discover the Neurobiology Behind It! - Glass Almanac
So be it, then!
The thing itself is the thing itself.
Touch!
Post-Dobbs abortions continue to increase: Report - Axios
Vulgar?
Is “it” an art at all?
So…you can read the lyrics above. Those words, in that simple order? That IS what the song really means.
What does it mean to me?
Would be wildly, reasonably sane to call “BULL’S-HIT!” on such fancy-shmancy anti-bullseye potshots.
Every meaning is valid to the degree it can be supported from within the text.
Everyone looks naked when you know the world's address
Popular, yes. That’s what vulgar originally meant.
Now my tearstains on the wall reflect an ugly sight
Some lovely story about what the artist went through prior to making the thing? Human interest, yes! We love to be deep in the gossip, we kind and faithful beings. Yet is this OF the artwork? No.
What the singer or writer, the true creator, the artist (modern, classic, wise or otherwise) thinks it should mean in addition to what they’ve indeed made is…puff. Fluff. Tacky add-on, at best.
It ain’t the thing. Is it?
It’s one motive, at least. If that’s your meaning then run off with it and see who’ll bow, buy, or slap a bow-tie on it for a garrotte. The rest of us?
Why even read my take on what it means? You think my “hot insider intel” can override, overrule or otherwise upset the work itself: in all it truly IS? Can interpretation unseat the text?
They told you simply: by making the whole thing, nothing less. Nothing more. In every single word strong strung in sequence.
I’m plain-out roaring, here!
Behold!
It is background intel, no part of the work at all, at all.
I didn’t tell you what it meant.
Nope. It isn’t the thing.
I’m so mean I mean it all.
Frankly, The Dead’ve never been the same since Garcia died, except on record and if you take a lot of drugs, too. Got Art?
Bull. The public has always known better than that. It isn’t novelty of theoretic conception that makes good art. It is truth. It is beauty. Which can include: hideous ugliness, if true. Or: hideous ugliness, if for some reason you the viewer, the onlooker, the innocent bystander, the paying customer or the passerby decide: I rather like the feel and style of that hideous thing.
Who says what’s art? The Modernists united in a real cheap-shot art-critic sold and commanded zeitgeist ventriloquism voice: The Artist! Art Is Whatever The Artist Nominates As Art!
Give us what cha got, “artist.” If indeed you consider yourself an artist: give it up. For all we the living, for any and each who might be moved, AND HOW.
This is each person’s moving contribution to any work of art: to say how it moved in you.
No critic and no investor, no, not even any Capital-A Author or Major League Maker can add one jot, jolt, titter or teardrop to the finished work of art. As it was, or as it lasts in its finished form.
This all holds true for every thing called art, in every form of art, or called art.
TELL THEM ALBERT EINSTEIN AND COPERNICUS
Disabuse you of that “secret meaning” or “real meaning” nonsense notion pronto and galore! I mean consistently, coherently, cogently and with integrity: in every onstage bout of audience-aimed grateful candor, plus every interview segment you’re likely catch them in, speaking for themselves to all the world: unabashed, unashamed, not too guardedly at all.
This isn’t a matter for seriousness.
worn...etc.
Here’s the musical recording from the band They call “TMBG”
Let’s not get personal. A woman, even a very young and competitive woman far too good for the likes, loves, needs or wants of me (or you, for that matter) is only called a “dog” by some sour grapes loser. Or! Hey, if she must love dogs, maybe she won’t even mind being called in a doggy style?
“The Word’s Address”
I’m not sure if it’s like Wet Leg. I haven’t really drawn a bead on Wet Leg yet. Look.
Official audio only.
“The text” here means only: the entire artwork of whatever kind. Picasso’s Guernica is a text. Citizen Kane is a text. “The World’s Address” is our text, for this instance.
The thing really done.
I’ve got to be some kind of “sense, senses or sensual snob” who wants to root like King Tut on human growth hormones and steal your golden moment right out from under you, right?
A great deal like Robert Frost. “No musician!” would you say? HA. HA! HA! HA! Nonsense!
It means what it is, not what some paid or unpaid maker thinks it should mean to you. Kind of like oh, I don’t know, Neil Diamond? Neil Sedaka? Bing Crosby? I’ve no idea really. Elvis Costello? Aimee Mann? Sean Penn’s sister-in-law? The Beatles? Who gives a rat’s toss? These people were paid and paid handsomely to prettily dish up something for us, for us to take in and mean, and feel. And sure, think! Why not?
What more could one ask of a work of art? Sometime, maybe try to ask the song itself what it means.
Not in some misbegotten competition with the dead.
A finished work. A “fait accompli.”
What kind of hack art critique confidence job (or “fanfic”) would you like us to call that crap?
Life's parade of fashion
Or do not. Yoda won’t take them odds, and you shouldn’t aspire to be some critic’s forceless green-tinged puppet, whether cartoon or foam rubber: IT STANK EVERYWHERE BUT THE BOX OFFICE, and buddy?
In many circles (and the glorious art that erupts and cruises forth from these circles is not to be puked at), what’s vulgar is pretty always a-gonna be a good bet: to pop.
You decide. Purpose is what you put into life.
…this is all very well beyond what the thing itself means, or meant. It is new.
Nothing beyond what was literally made part of the song is the song’s meaning.
You know it.
Now pull the other one! How did it make YOU feel, about your mother for instance?
A sad pun that reflects a sadder mess
Meaning is what you get out of it.
Why should anyone swallow it? Except for what IT truly is? Your own original production! At best or at worst, “based on” or “inspired by” the thing itself.
The original authors did.
A deft touch like Peter Gabriel, in such regards.
Why be a turd about it, stuffing imaginary made-up “author’s intent” (beyond what the author actually DID do, DID make whole) into some fantasy “envelope-pushing” exercise?
Context is not “key.”
Call it an affectionym, but be sure the other wants yours first. It isn’t a very high art to be sure, this dealing and doling of names. Lables and boxes, more often than not? Empty of everything but nerve, bile and gall. Turn your head and cough, please. Yes!
Don’t believe the hype.
It is we the living who’ll each decide what it means: to each and all.
THE WORLD'S ADDRESS
Whatsoever is moved in you: now THAT you can know!
AND LET THEM HEAR THIS SONNNG
Hear!
Shall we uphold that craptastically egotistical self-shoveling attitude? Why should we? Because we, two should be famous for moving the world with what moves us in art? Hey.
Taste!
I know you've deceived me
It is trivia.
Not I.
It is yours. Your own. Don’t be too precious about it, please. Shoot me a comment below: tell me what’s moving in you, easily or uneasily as you listen for yourself to the song (below!), and judge it for all that it is, or isn’t. For what they have done, or for what they have failed to do: in you.
I’m far worse than serious on such scores: I’m sincere.
Answer one. “What song” indeed! I’m listening to "The World's Address":
Couldn't sleep last night
Everybody’s got one.
We humans do love trivia, and some of us: we love it more than art.
That doesn’t mean the trivialist has some secret special key and code in their possession. They’re just kinky like that: like to be deep in the loopy sh!t. Smells like some way too-old pretend teen’s spirit hit the fan again, though. VULGAR.
Whatever each viewer, hearer, taker-in and receiver “gets” out of it is, if anything, that critic or fan’s own personal production. Of what? Meaning. Value. Worth. Call it by any metric you can lay forth or set out: it’s pure personal judgment in play now, dog. Cur. Bitch?
A song made for public consumption has no “real meaning” beyond what it means to you: the hearer. The listener, ideally. The artist, the creator, the originator or the band of record merely bring you the best they could put out to move you, given available talent and production time. So?
Am I serious?
Take it in every sensory or sensual way it exists, by any medium presented! Like, love, want, even need, and even share that with others! Your own lived experience of the thing itself, yeah-heah!
Nobody could possibly credit my take over and above or underneath the text itself, the thing itself: the actual work and nothing else. Nothing but. All that’s in or within it. Right?
Hold!
Who do you say I am? Some “grammar anarch & semantic champion” for the people!
Check between one or the other set of your cheeks, and go blow.
Not at all like Pet Shop Boys, but who really is these days? Beyond Tennant and Lowe, no one has ever been very much like those Pet Shop Boys, actually.
A. See below. It’s a 2-Parter!
No need to confess
It is what the thing itself meant in you. Or: means to you, coming forward now.
Kind of like John Linnell, John Flansburgh & The Band Of Dans (who hadn’t yet joined the bandwagon as of the above-limned song’s original finished debut).
Is that what you think of me?
This is They Might Be Giants, and contrary to the dull, glistening and listless imaginations of self-perverted twerps who think songs have “real” or “secret” meanings that only the author or authors could tell you, John L. & John F. of They Might Be Giants will lay it all right out on the line for you every time I’ve ever seen ’em get into it.
A whole lot like AC/DC, Sia Furler and The Black Keys! Great pool hall music, the lot of them!